Check out our blog!
Forumwarz is the first "Massively Single-Player" online RPG completely built around Internet culture.

You are currently looking at Flamebate, our community forums. Players can discuss the game here, strategize, and role play as their characters.

You need to be logged in to post and to see the uncensored versions of these forums.

Log in or Learn about Forumwarz

Role Playing
Switch to Civil Discussion Role-Playing
Ban Me Popularity / Flamebate E-Peen
Poll: Bring back the old ways?
You must be logged in to vote.

kittiejenn

Avatar: 18080 2011-11-01 00:29:42 -0400
39

[Backdoor Amigos]

Level 35 Emo Kid

So damn naughty it wraps back around to nice.

I think we all agree how annoying it was before they changed the way the popularity peen worked and you’d sign in to 4 or 5 unsolicited friend requests daily. Compared to the current methods of friendwhoring, I think I prefer it the way it used to be. Give me a couple of requests daily instead of blanketing flamebate and community ads.

Also, I don’t really remember there being anything wrong with the way you got the flamebate peen before, but I’m sure there was something. Whatever it was, it can’t be nearly as annoying as it is now.

Bring back the old ways so some of us will actually stand a chance of getting them and not be hated by the community in the process. Also it might be nice to implement some method of “retiring” people from the boards. Perhaps only have recent posts and friend requests count?


Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

Click here to give me internets!

View/click my draginz please

Fran

Avatar: 34789 2015-08-06 21:23:09 -0400
40

[A Beautiful Place -
Out in the Country
]

Level 62 Camwhore

I wonder who is the bumbling idiot that still has fake currency on this website and actually spends

As someone with both E-Peens, I say bring them back to the old ways.

With the current methods, you’re forced to TM bomb if you want any chance of getting the E-Peens. It’s annoying to be on the receiving end, yes, but it’s even more annoying when you’re the one doing it.

Not everyone will add you/post on your thread, I’d say it’s one of every 3 people you tm. So you already have to send 3x more tms then you should, just to get people to post. It’s useless spam. And I believe when someone sends a lot, it’s really heavy for the FW servers.

At least with the old popularity method you could simply spam friend requests. You only needed to enter on a character profile, add him, and hope to get accepted. Now you need to scan Klan Domination Tab/Chats/Domination Pods, create a witty TM, and hope the person adds you. It’s much more annoying for both parts the new ways.

Fran edited this message on 08/31/2008 9:15AM

You are 1 person out of 7 billion people on 1 planet out of 8 planets in 1 starsystem out of 100 billion starsystems. You are enormously insignificant.

Log in to see images!

Echuu

Avatar: 6433 Tue Jul 21 22:01:07 -0400 2009
10

[Backdoor Amigos]

Level 20 Troll

You made Vader snobby.

Yes on flamebate, not of friends, never on friends.

Also when someone tops the list, remove them.


I'M A SIG-DISABLING COCKMONGLER

kittiejenn

Avatar: 18080 2011-11-01 00:29:42 -0400
39

[Backdoor Amigos]

Level 35 Emo Kid

So damn naughty it wraps back around to nice.

Echuu Posted:

Also when someone tops the list, remove them.

The only problem with this is you would have 365 people receiving the peen every year. At some point it would get down to people with one reply to their threads or one friend request. Currently 15 people have flamebate and 20 have popularity, so it still needs to be fairly rare, just not impossible.


Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

Click here to give me internets!

View/click my draginz please

Nicco

MODERATOR
Avatar: 24745 2011-07-31 00:34:23 -0400
51

[Harem and Sushi Bar]

Level 69 Troll

Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco

Echuu Posted:

Also when someone tops the list, remove them.

This.


Log in to see images!

Nicco

MODERATOR
Avatar: 24745 2011-07-31 00:34:23 -0400
51

[Harem and Sushi Bar]

Level 69 Troll

Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco Nicco

kittiejenn Posted:

The only problem with this is you would have 365 people receiving the peen every year. At some point it would get down to people with one reply to their threads or one friend request. Currently 15 people have flamebate and 20 have popularity, so it still needs to be fairly rare, just not impossible.

Maybe remove them if they top a leaderboard for a month?


Log in to see images!

Fran

Avatar: 34789 2015-08-06 21:23:09 -0400
40

[A Beautiful Place -
Out in the Country
]

Level 62 Camwhore

I wonder who is the bumbling idiot that still has fake currency on this website and actually spends

Nicco Posted:

Maybe remove them if they top a leaderboard for a month?

That would be a more desirable solution.


You are 1 person out of 7 billion people on 1 planet out of 8 planets in 1 starsystem out of 100 billion starsystems. You are enormously insignificant.

Log in to see images!

quangntenemy

Avatar: 14557 2011-10-31 11:07:55 -0400
59

[WeChall]

Level 69 Troll

:ronpaul: :****ing sucks:

Nicco Posted:

Maybe remove them if they top a leaderboard for a month?

Ban them instead Log in to see images!


Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

Log in to see images!

 Buying a lot of zomg im so fat.xpeg – 500 each 

Log in to see images!

scully

Avatar: 12797 2015-07-20 16:59:13 -0400
77

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Camwhore

I really do talk ****!

Flamebate Fodder used to be based purely on thread replies. The same character could not post twice in a row, but as long as replies were alternated it would count. It was changed after several members of Knights of LOL made scripts to auto reply to each other in klan threads. By the time the 4th person did it, the number of posts needed had been run up into the thousands.

The change to one post per character and not including “in klan” posts might be publicly annoying, but seems far more fair.

Same thing sort of happened for the popularity peen. At the time Bigguyinblack had it pretty solidly locked at 1000 friends. A couple of players decided to script friends request via player ID numbers. Not sure if it was coordinated or a coincidence that both decided to do it at the same time, but both ended up asking ET to cancel all their outstanding requests when the method was changed.

The request spamming is actually considerably lower since the change.


Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted. Log in to see images!

scully

Avatar: 12797 2015-07-20 16:59:13 -0400
77

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Camwhore

I really do talk ****!

The point of the walk down memory lane: either of the old methods was open to far more abuse and all it would take would be one serious jackbum willing to let the scripts run every day to always stay in the lead.

Really, it’s the nature of the “there can only be one” leaderboards that lend themselves to the problem. The leaderboards existed before I started playing, so at maximum they were created when there were fewer than 10k characters. There are now well over 50k. The more characters, the more frequent and noticeable the whoring will become and the more frustrating and impossible it will be for collector/achiever types to have reasonable goals.


Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted. Log in to see images!

Bling Fling

Avatar: Bling Fling's Avatar
21

Level 35 Camwhore

“Legs Wide Open”

First of all, the way this topic and the replies so far are written, this seems GD material (so people can’t fabulous person up the discussion by posting porn and stuff): however I’ll post a serious reply here.

Second: taking characters off the leaderboards. Not a good idea imo. The definition of a leaderboard is that the person who tops it has the most of the thing measured; not the most, except for SG, Fran, Lara Croft, Nana, etc. That seems just silly in my book.

Kittiejenn’s idea of having only recent posts/requests count, seems like a fine solutionan improvement. It makes the E-Peen and the boards more available, without giving out pityPeens to people who don’t meet the criteria to top them. To me at least, “Most replies in the past three months” makes a lot more sense as a criterion for E-Peen than “Most replies… except for an ever-growing number of characters who actually got more replies”.

I think “recent”, in both cases, should be about three months: that way the flamebate board gives an indication of “successful” posters (as it should), and inactive posters don’t stay up way high forever. Make that period much shorter and actual good posters will have zero chance to build up a competitive score.


Log in to see images!

YO DAWG

I HERD YOU LIKE QUOTES SO WE PUT A QUOTE IN YO QUOTE SO YOU CAN READ WHILE YOU READ

Wylin

Avatar: 19712 Thu Mar 26 21:15:20 -0400 2009
35

[Brainfreeze]

Level 69 Troll

Causing Jealousy On The Internet On A Daily Basis.

Nicco Posted:

Maybe remove them if they top a leaderboard for a month?

Echuu

Avatar: 6433 Tue Jul 21 22:01:07 -0400 2009
10

[Backdoor Amigos]

Level 20 Troll

You made Vader snobby.

Nicco Posted:

Maybe remove them if they top a leaderboard for a month?

Week.


I'M A SIG-DISABLING COCKMONGLER

enire

Avatar: enire's Avatar
9

[70 Character Story-
tellers
]

Level 10 Troll

“Pain in the ASCII”

kittiejenn Posted:

Perhaps only have recent posts and friend requests count?

Bling Fling Posted:

Kittiejenn’s idea of having only recent posts/requests count, seems like a fine solutionan improvement. It makes the E-Peen and the boards more available, without giving out pityPeens to people who don’t meet the criteria to top them. To me at least, “Most replies in the past three months” makes a lot more sense as a criterion for E-Peen than “Most replies… except for an ever-growing number of characters who actually got more replies”.

I think “recent”, in both cases, should be about three months: that way the flamebate board gives an indication of “successful” posters (as it should), and inactive posters don’t stay up way high forever. Make that period much shorter and actual good posters will have zero chance to build up a competitive score.

I like this a lot. It’s not a solution to the whoring in flamebate/spamming of tubmails…

Maybe the whoring is OK; it’s part of the game. Giving out BPs as a means of whoring, though (and I’ll confess here to being a guilty party with one of my alts), is perhaps a little unfair, as it’s another example of RL money buying people a game advantage.

As for TM spam, I haven’t noticed enough of it to be bothered, but one solution for people who really hate it might be to have a setting whereby only people on your friends list can send you TMs (plus in-game NPCs, of course).


Log in to see images!

scully

Avatar: 12797 2015-07-20 16:59:13 -0400
77

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Camwhore

I really do talk ****!

Meh, this has been discussed to death. The leaderboards are terribly flawed, not just the Flamebate/friendwhore boards. Really, of the leaderboards with a peen bumociated, at least getting those doesn’t require whoever is in front of you to either bow out or stop playing the way they want in order for someone new to have a chance. How does someone get most forums pwned, most cred, most INCIT wins if the players at the top keep maxing out their play? People give SG a lot of crap, but of the “they have to stop playing” boards she has given others the chance to jump ahead more than anyone else. Maybe they aren’t meant to be something for more than a very few players, but as long as they are viewed as collectible or an achievement, people are going to chase after them.

I do hope CZ considers doing something either with the release of Episode 2 or shortly after. It would be a shame to see a decent influx of new players, only to see some leave due to feeling it was impossible to achieve anything goal based.

I mentioned it in Echuu’s old thread and still say a monthly or seasonal reset would make a huge difference and actually bring a competitive feel to the boards.


Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted. Log in to see images!

enire

Avatar: enire's Avatar
9

[70 Character Story-
tellers
]

Level 10 Troll

“Pain in the ASCII”

scullyangel Posted:

I mentioned it in Echuu’s old thread and still say a monthly or seasonal reset would make a huge difference and actually bring a competitive feel to the boards.

Well, what about regular rotations like this combined with some kind of “hall of fame” (not for e-peen) where the highest scores of all time can be seen and don’t get deleted?


Log in to see images!

Wylin

Avatar: 19712 Thu Mar 26 21:15:20 -0400 2009
35

[Brainfreeze]

Level 69 Troll

Causing Jealousy On The Internet On A Daily Basis.

Or what if all your friends counted but you were capped at sending 12 friend requests per day?

scully

Avatar: 12797 2015-07-20 16:59:13 -0400
77

[Good Omens]

Level 69 Camwhore

I really do talk ****!

enire Posted:

Well, what about regular rotations like this combined with some kind of “hall of fame” (not for e-peen) where the highest scores of all time can be seen and don’t get deleted?

That would definitely be the best of all options. Domination boards are broken into all time and seasonal and, Domination problems aside, it seems to be working nicely.


Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted. Log in to see images!

Internet Delay Chat
Have fun playing!
To chat with other players, you must Join Forumwarz or Log In now!