Is there a list somewhere so we can avoid duplicating? That is, a list somewhere other than in forumbuilder post/topic edits?

How about

@food_bakeddesert: “apple crisp”, “fruitcake”, “angelfood cake”, “lemon tart”, “blueberry muffin”

-use: could add that level of bizzareness people go for when they concatenate it with things like yoga and sex positions, or could be used as a strange insult

@electronics_computer – a sort of subcategory of electronics, computer would randomly return the name of a computer.

One thing I’d like to see more than anything else is the ability to specify _male _female at the end of words that generate people’s names (physician, politician, celebrity, etc.) and the ability to link it to a pronoun such as he/she, his/hers, etc. Right now a lot of people just write “he” “she” or “their” and it looks really weird (though I suppose the internet is supposed to be weird – but I think most posters, no matter how stupid, would probably be able to get the gender of the person they are referencing correct). Then additionally, being able to link body_part or any other gender-specific word types to these would be awesome as well.

Having more specifiers for categories would be nice as well (e.g. @electronics_old, @electronics_new) similar to the way politician has _contemporary, _obscure, and _old.

Finally, the ability to change the tense of a verb or the plurality of objects would be much appreciated. It’s weird when you see someone do “@masturbateing” and you wind up with “bash the bishoping” or “wax the dolphining”.

Disclaimer: I know some of these are complicated to implement and the average user already @totally fucks up when trying to use the existing system, but hey, you asked for suggestions.

ignore previous post, sorry!

I was surprised not to find this WORD TYPE, although I wouldn’t be surprised if it was just me being too stupid to find it.

@ANGRY_VERB

Examples: outrage, incense, offend, enrage, aggravate

I found myself wanting a @tool earlier, primarily to fuck things with. (Shit, Freud was right.) Y’know, though, like chainsaws, hammers, socket wrenches, that sort of thing.

A very basic one I was sad that did not exist:

@adjective

greasy, fat, smart, ugly, wonderful, etc…

And it’s sub-categories:

@adjective_mean, @adjective_nice, @adjective_gross

Also, we have @celebrity, but could we have @celebrity_male and @celebrity_female, it can make things flow a little better if you can choose the sex.

@city_name would be appreciated.

Categories for separate {highbrow}/{high-sounding} and {lowbrow}/{common/vulgar} subdivisions of all of the categories.

Here are some examples:

nouns – i.e. sports (lawn bowling, golf, fox hunting, cricket VS monster-truck racing, dogfighting, wrestling)

adjectives – i.e. compliments (dashing VS hot)

adverbs – i.e. totally (entirely, wholly VS sho’nuff)

etc.

This is along the vein of insult_shakespearean vs insult_general.

Would have been GREAT for urbane dictionary, and may be useful for future forums. It doesn’t sound right when my posts for the current forum have words that no proper gentleman would even know, much less use, and posts for potentially low-brow or backwoods forums shouldn’t use fancy words.

This is bit complex, but is there any way we could ensure the words are alliterative? e.g instead of “Slattern Nell’s Journey” we could ask the MadLibs to try and pick words that all start with the same letter. I think “Tarty Tracy’s Travels” or “Raunchy Rachel’s Ride” is far more appealing and slick.

I saw a submission yesterday that was funny/clever when a bunch of words all began with the same letter – something like “You, sir, are a disgusting, despicable dog” but boring when it was any old words.

Perhaps putting [a] after words would ask the engine to alliterate all the words tagged thus, e.g. @sexy[a] @name_female[a]’s @journey[a].

And yes, this would be tricky, open to abuse, and time consuming, but it would be 23875 kinds of awesome!

Oh yes, and we need a @sexy madlib – hot, raunchy, etc. Maybe even a @sexy_female (babe, tart) and a @sexy_male (rock hard, babe). Eh, that’s a bit half-formed, but I’m sure you’ll make sense of it.

Would be nice of the number generation let us just put in a range of numbers.

Anybody else find that there are word types that give you inappropriate results? Which word types?