One thing that has occurred to me about forumbuildr is that material which is introduced is static. What I mean by this is that any less-than-ideal content that gets through the vetting process is going to stay online forever(I’m mostly thinking about multiple component things here, not forum logos or designs). There can also be problems when random wordlists are altered, as posts that were coherent to their subject in the past become less so as magic word lists expand.

I suppose what I’m trying to say is that, at some point in the future when there’s enough of a group of forums and community on here for it to be worthwhile, it may be worth implementing some means of vetting and/or improving preexisting forums, at least the ones made through forumbuildr. If such a system were created, it may make sense for it to have a smaller voting or editing population, since this would be editing and proofreading, not creating gobs of new content. Just an idea for the future, to ensure a consistent level of output quality.